
New Zealand Proposes Combined Event Music Licence as Music Industry Calls for AI Copyright Protection
OneMusic New Zealand has opened consultation on a combined licence covering musical works and sound recordings used at concerts, festivals, DJ performances and other events. Separately, Recorded Music NZ is asking the government to require AI companies to obtain permission before using copyrighted music for training.
Both proposals focus on the same fundamental issue: ensuring that artists, songwriters and music rightsholders are properly licensed and paid when their work is used.
Key Facts
DevelopmentConfirmed informationEvent-licensing proposalOneMusic New Zealand proposes combining licences for musical works and sound recordings.Rights coveredAPRA-represented compositions and Recorded Music NZ sound recordings.Events affectedConcerts, festivals, DJ performances and other events using recorded music.Proposed start dateMay 1, 2027.Consultation deadlineOctober 30, 2026.AI copyright proposalAI companies should obtain licences before using protected music for training.AI transparencyDevelopers should retain records or copies of the material used for training.Current statusBoth developments are proposals; neither creates an immediate new legal requirement.What Is OneMusic New Zealand Proposing?
OneMusic New Zealand is proposing a combined event-licensing scheme covering two separate categories of music rights:
Musical works represented by APRA
Sound recordings represented by Recorded Music NZ
If implemented, event organisers could obtain both sets of rights through a more unified licensing process.
The proposal is intended to begin on May 1, 2027, following consultation with event promoters, producers, venue operators and other organisations that use recorded music at public events.
The consultation remains open until October 30, 2026. Requests for an in-person consultation meeting must be submitted by October 9.
Full details are available through Recorded Music NZ’s official event-licensing consultation announcement.
Why Are Two Music Licences Required at Events?
A commercially released song normally contains at least two separate copyrights.
The first covers the underlying musical work, including the composition and lyrics. The second covers the particular recorded performance, commonly called the sound recording or master.
Playing recorded music at a public event may therefore involve both:
Permission to use the composition
Permission to use the sound recording
APRA represents musical works, while Recorded Music NZ represents participating recording artists and sound-recording rightsholders.
The proposed OneMusic scheme would bring these rights together within a combined event-licensing structure.
Which Events Could Be Covered?
The proposal is aimed at live events where recorded music contributes to the audience experience.
These may include:
Concerts using recorded music before or between performances
Music festivals
DJ performances
Food and cultural festivals
Special events
Events using background music
Events where recorded music is the main attraction
Recorded Music NZ says licensing practices for sound recordings have not historically been consistent across New Zealand’s live-event sector.
The new proposal is intended to establish a more consistent approach while ensuring that recording artists and rightsholders are paid when their recordings are publicly performed.
Is the New Event Licence Already in Effect?
No. The scheme is currently under consultation.
The proposed May 1, 2027 launch date does not mean the scheme has already taken effect. Stakeholders can still provide feedback on its structure and operation before the consultation closes.
OneMusic is inviting responses from:
Concert and festival promoters
Event producers
Venue operators
Organisations running music-based events
Other affected music users
Event businesses should review the consultation carefully because the final scheme could affect licensing processes, compliance responsibilities and operating costs.
How Does the Proposal Compare With Australia?
The New Zealand proposal closely follows the combined OneMusic licensing model already operating in Australia.
According to Recorded Music NZ, the proposed scheme reflects established APRA New Zealand licence rates. Its approach to incorporating sound-recording rights is based closely on the Australian model, which was developed following consultation with the live sector.
Some major promoters operating in Australia are also active in New Zealand, making the Australian framework a relevant reference point.
However, the final New Zealand scheme may still change following consultation. Organisers should not assume that every term will be identical to the Australian system.
What Is Recorded Music NZ Asking the Government to Do About AI?
Recorded Music NZ has published a position paper asking the New Zealand government and political parties to protect existing copyright law as generative AI develops.
Its proposal contains three principal requests.
1. Preserve Existing Copyright Protection
Recorded Music NZ argues that AI companies should obtain a licence before using protected music to train generative-AI models.
Its position is that existing copyright law already gives artists and rightsholders the ability to decide whether and under what conditions their recordings may be used.
The organisation opposes the introduction of a new copyright exception that would allow AI companies to use music for training without permission.
2. Require Meaningful AI Transparency
Recorded Music NZ wants AI companies to retain records or copies of the material used to train their systems.
This information could help rightsholders:
Identify whether their music was used
Make informed licensing decisions
Verify contractual compliance
Investigate possible infringement
Seek payment where appropriate
Hold developers accountable
Without reliable training records, artists and labels may find it difficult to determine whether their work has entered an AI model.
3. Create a Coordinated National AI Strategy
The organisation is also calling for a joined-up government approach to artificial intelligence.
Its policy paper argues that AI creates risks extending beyond copyright, requiring coordination between government agencies, creative industries, technology businesses and other affected sectors.
Recorded Music NZ’s complete position is available through its official paper on AI, copyright and the future of New Zealand music.
Does Recorded Music NZ Oppose Artificial Intelligence?
No. Its stated position is not a general rejection of AI.
Recorded Music NZ is arguing that innovation should operate within existing copyright protections. AI companies would still be able to use music when they obtain permission and agree to the relevant licensing conditions.
The organisation’s main concern is the use of copyrighted recordings without the knowledge, consent or compensation of artists and rightsholders.
Its proposed framework therefore focuses on:
Permission
Licensing
Transparency
Accountability
Government coordination
Why Are These Two Developments Connected?
The event-licensing consultation and the AI policy paper deal with different uses of music, but they share the same principle.
When music creates value for an event, platform or technology company, the relevant copyrights must be identified and licensed.
At a concert or festival, that may mean licensing both the song and the recording. In an AI system, it may mean obtaining permission before copyrighted recordings are copied or processed for model training.
Both developments also demonstrate why accurate music metadata is essential. Rightsholders cannot be identified, licensed or paid efficiently without reliable ownership and repertoire information.
What Could the Event-Licensing Proposal Mean for Organisers?
A combined licence could make it easier for event organisers to understand which rights they need and where to obtain them.
Potential advantages include:
One more coordinated licensing process
Clearer coverage of compositions and recordings
More consistent obligations across the event sector
Reduced risk of accidentally leaving one category of rights unlicensed
However, organisers will also need to assess:
The proposed fee structure
Reporting requirements
Which events qualify
Which uses are included
Whether any exemptions apply
How the scheme affects existing licences and contracts
The consultation period gives the live sector an opportunity to raise practical and financial concerns before the scheme is finalised.
What Could the AI Proposal Mean for Artists and Labels?
If the government adopted Recorded Music NZ’s recommendations, AI developers using music could face clearer licensing and record-keeping expectations.
For artists and labels, this could strengthen their ability to:
Decide whether their music may be used for AI training
Negotiate commercial terms
Track the use of recordings
Protect artist identities and catalogues
Challenge unauthorised use
Receive compensation from licensed AI products
The effectiveness of any system would still depend on enforcement, access to reliable records and clearly defined consequences for non-compliance.
Why It Matters
New Zealand’s music sector is addressing licensing at two different points in the industry: public events and artificial-intelligence development.
The OneMusic proposal could create a more consistent way to license music used at concerts, festivals and DJ performances. Recorded Music NZ’s AI paper could help preserve the right of artists and labels to control whether their recordings are used for model training.
For the wider global music industry, both proposals offer an important lesson: new technology and new business models do not remove the need to identify rights, obtain permission and compensate creators.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is OneMusic New Zealand proposing?
OneMusic is proposing a combined licence for APRA-represented musical works and Recorded Music NZ sound recordings used at events.
When could the proposed event licence begin?
The proposed starting date is May 1, 2027.
When does the consultation close?
The consultation closes on October 30, 2026.
Is the combined event licence already mandatory?
No. It is currently a proposed licensing scheme under consultation.
What does Recorded Music NZ want from AI companies?
It wants AI companies to obtain licences before using copyrighted music and retain records of the material used for training.
Is Recorded Music NZ asking for a ban on AI music?
No. It is asking for AI development to respect copyright, licensing and transparency requirements.
Why should AI companies keep training records?
Training records allow rightsholders to identify use of their music, make licensing decisions, check compliance and pursue unauthorised use.













